Archive for the ‘Search Engine Optimization’ Category

It’s fundamental: focus on website

By MITCH JOEL, Freelance

You thought this column was going to tell you that you’re missing the boat because your company is not on Twitter or blogging. Wrong.

Maybe the problem is that you have not created an iPhone app yet, or that you don’t even know if there is a Facebook page set-up for the brands, products and services that you sell. Wrong again.

All of the attention you think you should be spending on online marketing in the many digital channels and platforms will bring your company zero return if you don’t have a website that is not only nice and easy-to-use, but findable through all of the search engines (yes, that includes Google, Microsoft and Yahoo!).

It’s time to get back to basics. It’s almost laughable to think that some companies don’t have a serious, robust and up-to-date website in 2009. No matter what you do - and this include business-to-consumer (B2C) and business-to-business (B2B) - everyone, at every level of any organization, always goes online to see just who they are doing business with. This could be potential customers, clients, vendors, consultants and more. As each day passes, we’re seeing just how significant a website is to the overall business strategy of all companies.

Here’s a scenario: you’re having lunch with a business colleague who recommends a new laptop for you to check out. Do you run down to Future Shop or Best Buy? Do you call your IT department and have them fax you over a spec sheet? No and no. You do what everyone does: you check it out online.

You do a quick search, look for some reviews and empower yourself with more knowledge than any retail clerk at any major electronics retailer could ever have. In fact, when you finally do hit the stores, you are so informed about the product and features that your more advanced questions send the clerk to the exact same spot that you used: the Internet and the manufacturer’s website.

Your website is becoming the primary and first connection that most people have with your company and brand. Remember the old saying “You never get a second chance to make a first impression?” Every day, hundreds (maybe thousands) of people are thinking about your company, researching it online and checking out your website. What does your website really say to that person if it is the first impression?

Here’s the good news: fixing up your website is probably one of the most cost-effective marketing solutions to multiple business challenges.

Your online presence is no longer just an interactive brochure (that’s so 1998). Now, more than ever, your corporate website is the gateway to your business. It’s far too easy to get caught up in the latest shiny object to come along, but never let that distract you from taking a good, serious and hard look at what everyone sees when they come to your online home.

“It’s not that important for us. It really isn’t that big of a deal. Real people with real business opportunities are going to do more due diligence, and they’re going to connect with us in person.”

That’s the most common rebuttal to the “get your website fixed ASAP” argument. It’s simple arrogance. It also demonstrates a true lack of understanding the realities of the new business landscape.

I’ve connected with many venture-capital types, and heard their constant refrain about how they had got interested in a particular business - be it from an investment or potential partnership - only to have the bets go off once they went to their website (or discovered there wasn’t one). The simple conclusion: How could these companies make a wise investment if they can’t even get a simple website together?

The big idea here is to take a step back. Analyze what your current website looks like. Use one of the many free Web analytics tools (Google Analytics or Yahoo Web Analytics) to monitor how many people are coming to your website every day, how they found you - what keywords did they use in the search engines or what links.

Once you know that, you can start building your site around what matters most to your users. You can write copy in their language (not with your business jargon) and make the site flow better. Make sure that your site is built and programmed with “clean” language that is friendly for the search engines. Review your website, frequently. Buy some friends some pizza and ask them for their candid feedback on what you’re doing online.

Remember, even if your website is not perfect, great design and content will make up for shortcomings. Having a clean and well structured website will drive traffic from the search engines as well. Believe it or not, potential customers are looking for you right now. What are they finding? You or your competition?

© Copyright (c) The Montreal Gazette

On the surface, the World Wide Web appears to be a static structure, with establishment web sites like Google, Yahoo and Wikipedia consistently among the most visited. But take a closer look at individual web pages instead of sites and measure popularity by the number of other pages that link to it, and a different picture appears; as in high school or high-fashion, popularity on the web is a fickle thing, according to a Canadian researcher.

Only slightly more than half of the most popular web pages right now would have been on a similar list a year ago, according to University of Regina assistant professor Nima Sarshar, a finding that underlies the constantly changing structure of the web.

Sarshar, working with two colleagues from the University of California, Los Angeles, looked at how talent, experience and the deletion of web pages affected the overall popularity of a page, where a page’s popularity is measured not in page views, but by the number of links it attracts.

Publishing their findings in the recent issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A., Sarshar and lead author Vwani Roychowdhury and Joseph Kong from UCLA expected to find that experience plays an important role, since the longer a web page has been around the more links it will accumulate.

And in a case of the rich getting richer, the more links a page accumulates, the more likely it will pop up in a search engine like Google.

But what role “talent” played was less clear, so to measure it they tracked which pages had accumulated 1,000 links during a 12-month period.

A web page that started the survey of 22 million web pages with more than 1,000 links was defined as an “experienced” page, while one that finished the 12-month survey with more than 1,000 links was defined as a “winner.”

What they found was that even with search engines more likely to send readers to established pages, 48 per cent of the winners at the end of the 12 months were not experienced.

The result is surprising, they say, since it is extremely rare for a less-established web page to receive 1,000 links.

Constant growth

Part of the reason for this, they say, is that the web is constantly growing, with the number of new pages growing at a rate that could be as high as 35 per cent annually. At the same time, they say, pages are constantly being deleted at a rate of about 10 per cent per month. And every time a page is deleted, the pages they pointed to die a little in popularity, too.

The net result is that for every new page created, 0.77 are deleted.

“Web page structure evolves in a matter of weeks,” said Sarshar. “It really tells us that within a year or two, the web is a totally new web.”

Translating these numbers to the actual number of web pages is a difficult task, since no one can say for certain how many pages exist on the web at any given moment.

Sarshar, Roychowdhury and Kong put the total number at over 12 billion, but acknowledge that is just a best estimate.

In July, Google software engineers, posting on the company blog, said their systems that process links found one trillion unique URLs on the web at once. But they admit addresses are not equivalent to web pages, and suggest that strictly speaking, the number of web pages is infinite, since a web calendar could have a “next day” link that could send the user to a new “page” theoretically forever.

Regardless of which estimate one looks at, the 22 million pages the authors looked at represents a tiny fraction of the total size of the web, Sarshar acknowledges. He said a longer-term study that casts a wider net would give greater insight into the changing shape of the web. But he and his colleagues see parallels between the way web pages connect to each other and existing societal models.

“The balancing act between experience and talent on the web allows newly introduced pages with novel and interesting content to grow quickly and surpass older pages,” the authors write.

“In this regard, it is much like what we observe in high-mobility and meritocratic societies: People with entitlement continue to have access to the best resources, but there is just enough screening for fitness that allows for talented winners to emerge and join the ranks of the leaders.”

Monday September 22, 2008 | 12:48 PM ET | CBC News

The key to selling on the Web is a few clicks away
 
MITCH JOEL
The Gazette

Axagen is pleased to bring you this article, which discusses the importance of accurate web translation for different markets as well as for optimizing your ranking on search engines

Sites must also reflect cultural preferences

 
ROBERTO ROCHA

The Canadian Tourism Commission knew exactly how to optimize its website to foreign markets. It knew that Germans prefer canoe trips, while the Japanese are fond of organized bus tours. The multilingual version of its website reflects these preferences.

“It all comes down to understanding your clients,” said Huiping Iler, chief executive of WINTranslation.com, a Web translation service in Ottawa.

But there are few examples like this one, she says. Most companies don’t bother to understand their audiences when they translate websites. Sloppily made multilingual sites either turn off international clients with bad translations or don’t show up at all in Web searches.

Take the concept of an open house for a home for sale. This is a practice unknown in many countries, yet companies nonetheless push the service on their foreign language sites, even translating the words “open house” literally.

This is not only a linguistic and cultural blunder, but it also keeps search engines from pointing to a website.

“There’s a real lack of understanding,” Iler said. “People who do marketing are often unilingual. When they have to make content for another market, they may not know a lot about search engine marketing.”

Iler said companies too often ignore the combined power of search engines and good translation. In a marketing era when Google is a measure of reputation and people rarely search past the first page of a search result, making a website visible to foreign markets is crucial.

This means knowing the keywords that people use to find information in different countries.

For instance, a company that sells laptops needs to know whether people in a given country search for “notebook computers” or “portable computers” and put those words prominently on a Web page.

But this can be problematic, said Sylvain Amoros, the head strategist for Magnet Search Marketing, a division of Cossette Communications. Certain industries, like seniors’ residences, demand a semantic sensitivity in their marketing.

“You can’t put words like ‘old people’ or even ’seniors’ in the content. So you have to find ways around that,” he said.

But even proper translations sometimes aren’t enough to keep foreign eyeballs coming in, said Duncan Moore, an online marketer who recently joined Cossette. Sites have to keep updating the content to reflect changing attitudes.

“If you’re a company that sells sports jerseys, you have to keep up with new teams or new events that come up,” he said. “Once you translate a site, it doesn’t mean the work is done.”

© The Gazette (Montreal) 2008

Search engines keep rants alive forever

In a social media world, where sharing that story with the world is only a blog post away, the stakes for companies have been raised.

And it’s not the actual complaints, comments or blog posts that hurt the most. It’s the the lingering Google search results that represent the real death by a thousand cuts.

It’s a topic that has been discussed, debated and dissected in the blogosphere since the early days. But the big question remains: do the complaints actually have an effect or are people just talking to themselves in their own little fishbowl?

Does the public know or care about raging online controversies like Hasbro defending its Scrabble trademark against the creators of the Scrabulous Facebook application or a copyright tussle over whether a bunch of Ford Mustang owners will be able to create and sell a calender with pictures of their Black Ford Mustangs via online marketplace CafePress?

If you were to survey a group of people walking downtown in any major metropolitan city in the world, what percentage of them would have even heard about the Hasbro-Scrabulous story? Does that make the story a non-issue?

The answer is both yes and no. Because of the way news now travels, we’re not all glued to one channel that has been edited for our “viewing pleasure.”

We can follow stories that not only matter to us as individuals, but that matter to the industries we serve or are interested in. The big “headline of the day” has become whatever we want it to be.

I think the game has changed. Here are four shifts in media and what they mean to marketers:

Media is much more fragmented. Not too long ago, there were only a handful of media and because of this, the stories were fairly similar. Cable brought us the whole “57 channels and nothing on” culture and then blogs made individuals into media empires.

The “mass” in mass media is quickly going away. People get their news/information from several unique and targeted outlets now. So, what’s news in my world is not news in your world. Forget about the Blogosphere, just look at specialty television. You could spend the whole year and only watch Home and Garden related programming (and you wouldn’t even have to change the channel).

The fishbowl is getting bigger and bigger. While these customer-service rants seem more like annoyances from a small group of people playing around with blogs, their impact is actually being amplified by a a shift in how people get their content and news. We’re moving from trusting “similar others” to trusting “similar others as trusted news sources.” Audiences for blogs and podcasts continue to rise as more and more people consume this content as an alternative/addition to their current media regime.

The Google Effect. All of this content lives forever in a search-engine optimized environment. As more and more people go online for their primary research, blog posts about rotten customer service continue to take their toll. Even if a customer-service rant gets resolved quickly and efficiently, the story lingers in those search results forever. Stories don’t die in a newspaper morgue anymore.

More than even, companies need to monitor, analyze and strategically plan what (and how) they’re going to say and do in these channels. More than ever, just reacting isn’t proving to be a sufficient response. More than ever, companies need to be looking at blogs, podcasts and even Twitter or Facebook status updates to hear the voice of the customer.

Blogs are not “so yesterday.” If anything, this type of content and communication is just starting to find its voice and establishing itself as one of the strongest media forces that can shape a business and its brand.

January 28, 2008 | Internet Marketing

A majority of businesses that have used pay-per-click advertising over the past two years to drive traffic to their company website have noticed a deterioration in return on investment (ROI).

This finding came from a survey commissioned by Dutch firm Toading and conducted by Pulstracker. It was found that 71% of surveyed companies in Europe claimed some deterioration, with 21% of the total complaining of a major drop in performance.

The principle cause for this decline, according to the surveyed companies, was likely to be increased competition within their own industry sector, as more pay-per-click advertisers in their space had pushed up the bidding for keywords (63%). Nearly a quarter of the companies complained that they were unable or could not afford to bring in outside expertise to fine-tune their performance (24%). Only 3% believed that the change was down to fluctuating market conditions in their sector, resulting in less demand for their product or service.

The complexity of setting up account options was mentioned (22%), but a majority of unhappy respondents (52%) said the biggest practical hurdle for them was the `complicated’ keyword bidding process. 26% said that balancing the need for outside expertise and consultancy with the corresponding cost and impact on ROI was causing problems for them.

Businesses’ continued use of pay-per click advertising shows that they have benefited and still find it a valuable tool, but they find it an unpredictable and complex undertaking, as this study has found,” said Mathijs van Abbe, CEO, Toading.

“Keyword bidding in particular crops up as a frustration for advertisers. This is a sign that, as markets become more crowded, advertisers need to be more precise about their offerings, including pricing information. Not only is this helpful for potential customers, but it can dramatically improve conversion rates, and doesn’t have to be the complicated process many fear it to be.”

SOURCE: WWW.HOTELMARKETING.COM

Search Engine Glossary

January 15th, 2008 No Comments

advertising network: A service where ads are bought centrally through one company, and displayed on multiple Web sites that contract with that company for a share of revenue generated by ads served on their site.algorithm: The technology that a search engine uses to deliver results to a query. Search engines utilize several algorithms in tandem to deliver a page of search results or keyword-targeted search ads.

click through rate (CTR): The rate (expressed in a percentage) at which users click on an ad. This is calculated by dividing the total number of clicks by the total number of ad impressions. CTR is an important metric for Internet marketers to measure the performance of an ad campaign.

content network: A group of Web sites that agree to show ads on their site, served by an ad network, in exchange for a share of the revenue generated by those ads. For example: Google AdSense or the Yahoo Publisher Network.

contextual advertising: Advertising that is targeted to a Web page based on the page’s content, keywords, or category. Ads in most content networks are targeted contextually.

cost per action (CPA): A form of advertising where payment is dependent upon an action that a user performs as a result of the ad. The action could be making a purchase, signing up for a newsletter, or asking for a follow-up call. An advertiser pays a set fee to the publisher based on the number of visitors who take action. Many affiliate programs use the CPA model.

cost per click (CPC): Also called Pay per Click (PPC). A performance-based advertising model where the advertiser pays a set fee for every click on an ad. The majority of text ads sold by search engines are billed under the CPC model.

cost per thousand (CPM): An ad model that charges advertisers every time an ad is displayed to a user, whether the user clicks on the ad or not. The fee is based on every 1,000 ad impressions (M is the Roman numeral for 1,000). Most display ads, such as banner ads, are sold by CPM.

geo-targeting: Delivery of ads specific to the geographic location of the searcher. Geo-targeting allows the advertiser to specify where ads will or won’t be shown based on the searcher’s location, enabling more localized and personalized results.

inbound link: An inbound link is an hyperlink to a particular Web page from an outside site, bringing traffic to that Web page. Inbound links are an important element that most search engine algorithms use to measure the popularity of a Web page.

keyword: A word or phrase entered into a search engine in an effort to get the search engine to return matching and relevant results. Many Web sites offer advertising targeted by keywords, so an ad will only show when a specific keyword is entered.

link bait: Editorial content, often sensational in nature, posted on a Web page and submitted to social media sites in hopes of building inbound links from other sites.

link building: The process of getting quality Web sites to link to your Web site, in order to improve search engine rankings. Link building techniques can include buying links, reciprocal linking, or entering barter arrangements.

meta tags: Information placed in the HTML header of a Web page, providing information that is not visible to browsers, but can be used in varying degrees by search engines to index a page. Common meta tags used in search engine marketing are title, description, and keyword tags.

pay per click (PPC): See Cost per Click (CPC).

quality score: A score assigned by search engines that is calculated by measuring an ad’s clickthrough rate, analyzing the relevance of the landing page, and considering other factors used to determine the quality of a site and reward those of higher quality with top placement and lower bid requirements. Some factors that make up a quality score are historical keyword performance, the quality of an ad’s landing page, and other undisclosed attributes. All of the major search engines now use some form of quality score in their search ad algorithm.

return on investment (ROI): The amount of money an advertiser earns from their ads compared to the amount of money the advertiser spends on their ads.

search advertising: Also called Paid Search. An advertiser bids for the chance to have their ad display when a user searches for a given keyword. These are usually text ads, which are displayed above or to the right of the algorithmic (organic) search results. Most search ads are sold by the PPC model, where the advertiser pays only when the user clicks on the ad or text link.

search engine marketing (SEM): The process of building and marketing a site with the goal of improving its position in search engine results. SEM includes both search engine optimization (SEO) and search advertising, or paid search.

search engine optimization (SEO): The process of making a site and its content highly relevant for both search engines and searchers. SEO includes technical tasks to make it easier for search engines to find and index a site for the appropriate keywords, as well as marketing-focused tasks to make a site more appealing to users. Successful search marketing helps a site gain top positioning for relevant words and phrases.

search engine results pages (SERPs): The page searchers see after they’ve entered their query into the search box. This page lists several Web pages related to the searcher’s query, sorted by relevance. Increasingly, search engines are returning blended search results, which include images, videos, and results from specialty databases on their SERPs.

social media: A category of sites that is based on user participation and user-generated content. They include social networking sites like LinkedIn or Facebook, social bookmarking sites like Del.icio.us, social news sites like Digg or Reddit, and other sites that are centered on user interaction.

spider: A search engine spider is a program that crawls the Web, visiting Web pages to collect information to add to or update a search engine’s index. The major search engines on the Web all have such a program, which is also known as a “crawler” or a “bot.”

title tag: An HTML meta tag with text describing a specific Web page. The title tag should contain strategic keywords for the page, since many search engines pay special attention to the title text when indexing pages. The title tag should also make sense to humans, since it is usually the text link to the page displayed in search engine results.

universal search: Also known as blended, or federated search results, universal search pulls data from multiple databases to display on the same page. Results can include images, videos, and results from specialty databases like maps and local information, product information, or news stories.

Web 2.0: A term that refers to a supposed second generation of Internet-based services. These usually include tools that let people collaborate and share information online, such as social networking sites, wikis, communication tools, and folksonomies.

Universal Search (blended search) is changing the SEO game.

With PPC, you get exactly what you pay for. For example, if your budget is $10,000 per month, you’ll get exactly $10,000 worth of clicks to your Web site. No more, no less.

Organic SEO? That’s a whole different ballgame.

Let’s assume you’ve selected the right keywords: ones that people use to find your Web site. It’s a given your core competency is SEO or you’ve hired a good SEO company.

You’ll receive much more value from your organic efforts than you could by paying for each click. Furthermore, the value from organic search could be increased beyond what we see today. Take a look at what could happen with Google’s Universal Search.

Google Universal Search Test

Google tests often, so don’t take the following scenario as imminent. We really don’t know how, or if, these changes will be implemented.

You need to understand universal search before your competitors do. Universal or blended search — call it what you will — will be the SERP of the future.

Google is exploring different layouts for its search ads. If you review the screenshots below, you’ll see maps or other universal search elements displayed in areas once reserved for PPC AdWords ads. One of my readers who’s a friend, Mike Black, alerted me to this dramatic change in the SERP.


No sponsored ads above the fold. Google map and local business listings located on the top/right column.


No sponsored ads above the fold. Google map and local business listings located on the top/right column.


Two sponsored ads located at the top. Local maps and business listings located on the top/right column.


Sponsored listings do have a stronger presence, but products receive a pretty good amount of exposure on the top/right column. This seems the easiest for Google to implement and helps to drive exposure for Google Checkout.


No sponsored ads at the very top with news and books getting placement on the top/right. sponsored ads, in this scenario, should end up above the fold.

Mike argues that Google’s blended search test shows the value of organic SEO and search engine diversification.

Will Google push AdWords ads further down the SERP and risk losing revenue? Mike’s money is on Google listing products, given the Google push for Google Checkout. That would let Google add small news links and local results but keep PPC ads above the fold.

How Google May Maximize Profits

What would Google Checkout-tagged product listings do to CPC bid prices?

Create a more competitive bidding war for top spots and, in Mike’s estimation, drive adoption of Google Checkout by merchants.

Your initial reaction might be “Why would they move those PPC placements? They’re really going to hurt their revenue stream if they upset the people who buy ads on Google.”

Google may succeed in encouraging companies to bid more ferociously for the top two positions. If universal search leads to more searches because it’s fun, this could be a win for Google (higher revenues) and users (better experience).

Could this potentially hurt many of those AdWords advertisers who’ve historically bid for lower placements? Possibly. We’ll have to see if this happens first, and then measure what effect that it has for CTR of those ads which may have been pushed down the page.

My gut tells me Google is already testing this.

Plan for What-if Scenarios

Whatever direction Google decides to take, organic SEO wins. Organic search results will become more important.

Perhaps all universal search elements will be displayed on the right column and 10 “real” organic search results back on each page of the SERPs. What if that “number one position” we’ve had for our most important keyword listing under maps or Google Base suddenly gets a lot more clicks, because it’s higher up on the page?

By Mark Jackson, Search Engine Watch,

A special report from the Search Engine Strategies conference, February 13-15, 2007, London, UK.

What is the most popular search engine in the UK? In Europe? In the world?

According to representatives from major ratings and traffic analysis services who shared their latest stats during “The Search Landscape” session at SES London, the answers to these questions are: Google, Google, and Google.

The Search Landscape session was one of the first on the opening day of the conference. It was moderated by Julian Smith, insight and research director at MEC Interaction, EMEA, part of Mediaedge:cia. Speakers included Alex Burmaster, European Internet analyst at Nielsen//NetRatings; Heather Hopkins, VP of research at Hitwise; Richard Zwicky, CEO of Enquisite; and Bill Hunt, CEO of Global Strategies International.

According to Nielsen//NetRatings’ Burmaster:

  • 256 million people visited a search engine in December 2006 – 81% of the global Internet population.
  • The search audience has grown by 10% over the last year, while the total Internet audience grew 8%.
  • The search audience has grown most dramatically in France (27%) and Spain (21%), ahead of the US (8%) – however, the US is still biggest market by far.
  • Search is most popular in the UK (85%), France (83%) and Spain (83%) — ahead of the US (77% reach).
  • Google’s audience has grown almost 2.5 times the rate of search’s – continuing to eat into the share held by its competitors. It now has almost 3 times the audience of nearest rival, Yahoo Search.
  • The US engines dominate local markets, but the market is “just” big enough for local players.
  • The average searcher views 93 search pages a month across 27 minutes, which represents 3.4% of total time spent on the Internet.
  • France and Spain have the heaviest users of search; US searchers are the lightest users.
  • Despite Google’s dominance, it is important to understand searcher behaviour doesn’t take place in isolation – around two-thirds of searchers visit at least two search brands.

According to Hitwise’s Hopkins:

  • In the UK, search engines are the largest category, traffic-wise, overtaking adult Web sites in October 2006.
  • Market share of visits to UK search engines was up 22% year over year in December; but other categories grew faster, including Net Communities & Chat, up 34%, News and Media, up 24%, and Food and Beverage, up 29%.
  • Google (www.google.co.uk and www.google.com) powered 77% of UK internet searches in the four weeks leading up to February 10, 2007; Yahoo Search (uk.search.yahoo.com and search.yahoo.com) powered 8%; Ask.com (uk.ask.com and www.ask.com) 5%; and MSN Search (search.msn.co.uk and msn.search.com) 5%.
  • Yahoo Search is growing rapidly – up 12% in the past year; Google is up 6% year on year, while MSN Search and Live Search are down 15% year on year; Ask.com UK is down 30% year on year, but up 12% in past 6 months.
  • Search is the point of entry to the Internet; she illustrated this with a Music Category Clickstream Map that showed the central position of Google UK.
  • Searchers behave differently on different search engines.
  • On Google UK and Yahoo UK & Ireland Search, searches for Web 2.0 properties MySpace and Bebo were more prominent.
  • On Ask.com UK, searches were more commercial, such as searches for “car insurance” and “share prices”.

According to Enquisite’s Zwicky:

  • Based on click through activity from August 1, 2006, to January 20, 2007, Google had a 71.6% share of the global search engine market, an 80.2% share of the UK search engine market, and a 78.4% share of the French search engine market.
  • Yahoo had an 11.1% share of the global search engine market, a 5.5% share of the UK search engine market, and a 3.8% share of the French search engine market.
  • However, from January 20 to February 12, 2007, Google’s share of the global search engine market dipped to 67.1%, it slipped to 76.1% in the UK, and slid to 76.9% in France.
  • The primary beneficiary appeared to be Yahoo, which saw its share of the global search engine market increase to 14.9%, rise to 8.3% in the UK, and improve to 5.3% in France.
  • Why the changes? Did Google’s new algorithm, which was designed to minimize the impact of Googlebombs, have an unintended blowback? Did sales of HP desktop and laptop computers, which had the Yahoo Toolbar pre-installed, soar over Christmas? Zwicky said each industry is searched differently, so “you need to know what it looks like for your own site.”

Hunt, the final speaker, presented the preliminary results of the SEMPO European User Study. The study was conducted by Jupiter Research in January 2007. It surveyed advertisers and agencies in France, Italy and Spain.

The top level findings included:

  • 31% of advertisers spent at least 50,000 Euros on search marketing, compared to 37% of agencies who spent that much on behalf of their clients.
  • 62% of advertisers plan to increase search marketing spend over the next 12 months.
  • French, Spanish, and Italian advertisers focus more on SEO, compared to paid search.
  • Advertisers plan on utilizing mobile search, video search and pay per call more in 2007.
  • Advertisers’ top search marketing objectives are generating immediate online sales and building brand awareness.
  • Increasing competition for top rankings has been advertisers’ and agencies’ greatest problem with their search marketing efforts.
  • Both advertisers and agencies, especially agencies in Spain, are satisfied with the ROI from their search marketing activities.
  • The main reasons advertisers hire agencies is to improve results, and due to a lack on internal knowledge/expertise.
  • 26% of advertisers not currently using an agency would consider using one to improve results. However, 61% are satisfied with keeping search marketing in-house.

Following their presentations, the panelists were peppered with questions about Google, Yahoo, social networking sites, YouTube, and MySpace. While Google still dominates the search landscape, it was clear that the attendees were interested in seeing the bigger picture.

By Greg Jarboe, Search Engine Watch,

Social change, demographic trends, economic shifts and rapidly evolving technologies are creating countless new challenges and opportunities for Canadian entrepreneurs. Here’s how you should respond.

Turn a shade of green

Going green accelerates business success by avoiding risks and adding to the bottom line.

Some attribute it to Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth. Others point to the disastrous affects of Hurricane Katrina. And just about everyone knows that something’s wrong with eating Thanksgiving dinner on your back deck in 30- degree heat. For whatever reason, North Americans are finally convinced of the growing urgency of addressing global climate change.

Unfortunately, when it comes to investing in sustainability strategies, most business owners are too time-crunched and cash-poor ? if they even know where to start. Busy is definitely part of the problem, says Whitby, Ont.-based Bob Willard, one of North America’s most respected analysts of the value of environmental sustainability in business.

But here’s a reason to find some time. In the past few years, organizations in Canada and around the world, from KPMG to the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, have been extolling the benefits of going green. Willard’s own extensive research indicates that by integrating sustainability practices into their operations, small and medium-sized companies can increase their profits by at least 66% over five years. Being socially responsible doesn’t impede business success, says Willard. It accelerates it by avoiding risks and adding to the bottom line.

The low-hanging fruit comes in the form of eco-efficiencies, which is just a fancy term for saving money in certain areas, says Willard. Among them: energy, water, materials and waste handling. For example, reducing waste volumes can reduce the need for the labour and machines that handle waste.

In the longer term, green firms can also expect reduced recruiting and attrition costs, and increased productivity. Employees want to contribute to a company that they think is doing the right thing, says Willard. For example, three-fifths of the graduates and potential employees surveyed by global management consultancy Accenture in 2004 rated ethical management as an important factor in choosing an employer. Similarly, 68% of the students in a 2003 global survey by Toronto- based GlobeScan disagreed that salary is more important than a company’s social and environmental reputation when deciding which company to work for.

Going green can boost revenue as customers increasingly factor the corporate citizenship of potential suppliers into their purchasing decisions. For instance, two-thirds of consumers are likely to switch their spending to companies that have demonstrated a commitment to green policies, according to a survey released earlier this year by Bullfrog Power, a Toronto-based producer of electricity from environmentally friendly sources.

Finally, more savings can be achieved by green businesses, which financial institutions view as better risks, in the form of reduced insurance and interest rates. When all benefits are quantified in a holistic business case, the rationale for acting becomes readily apparent, says Willard. The market is so ready for this stuff. The timing is perfect.

Vancouver-based Small Potatoes Urban Delivery has enjoyed significant benefits from implementing green initiatives. The grocery-delivery service has, for example, cut 60% from its lighting costs by removing lights from areas that didn’t need to be lit, and by replacing others with energy-efficient bulbs and ballasts. It prints its customer newsletter on the back of invoices, saving 200,000 sheets of paper per year, as well as the employee time it takes to stuff an extra sheet into every order. It also buys many of its computers second-hand or rebuilt, saving the company thousands of dollars while preventing e-waste. (Globally, discarded electronic devices contribute one billion pounds of plastic to landfills.)

The company even has an easier time finding staff because of its policies. A number of [job applicants] say they chose us because of our social and environmental mission, says president and CEO David Van Seters, adding that his recruitment costs have been significantly reduced.

Start your colour shift simply by asking employees and customers how they’d feel about your business going green, and get them engaged. Keep it loose and open, as a fun thing to take a look at, says Willard. Don’t go into this like it’s a crusade.

Adopt CRM software

CRM software helps deepen customer relationships, leading to sustainable longterm growth.

Forget about your product. Well, not quite. But, still, today’s most successful enterprises obsess less over the stuff they make or the services they provide, and more over the customers who buy them.

Most entrepreneurs now recognize that building deep customer relationships will lead to sustainable longterm growth, says a report released by Forrester Research this past summer. But to do so effectively, you could use help from technology that allows for deeper customer understanding - namely, customer relationship management software. CRM software can help you centralize client data, automate customer service processes such as status reports or e-mail campaigns, and alert you to when you’re behind schedule - all of which improve relationships and ultimately boost sales.

In a recent report by Boston, Mass.-based Bain & Company on management tools and trends, 84% of the senior executives of global firms polled said their companies used CRM technology. More important, they’re highly satisfied with it.

But whereas CRM technology used to be the exclusive domain of mid-sized and large corporations due to its former complexity and expense, today, it’s cheaper and easier to use than ever before, making it an attractive investment for entrepreneurial businesses. In fact, two-thirds (66%) of Canada’s Fastest-Growing Companies use CRM software.

We’ve had CRM from Day 1, says Paul Kerr, CEO of Scalar Decisions, a fast-growing IT consultancy based in Toronto. It’s one of the key tenets of how we run our business. It gives you instant access to key information, and it’s great for tracking key performance indicators of your business opportunities, and making sure you’re following customers closely.

Kerr can’t imagine running his $20-million business without it. I have salespeople across Ontario, and they all carry $4-million-a-year quotas, says Kerr. If I wanted a report on how they’re doing, I’d have to call each one, or request an email, and there’d be no consistency to those reports. Whereas CRM forces everyone into the same pattern, the same path.

Another benefit Kerr points out: You can go into the system at any time and see which deals in progress are the biggest. Then you’ll know which client you need to go and visit to [close the deal], he says.

For those already using CRM, Kerr recommends taking it to the next level and using an integrated business platform (IBP) called NetSuite. It’s a broad application covering business functions including CRM but also ERP, e-commerce, customer support, accounting, inventory management and more. With thousands of clients worldwide, San Mateo, Calif.-based NetSuite is the leading IBP provider to SMEs, its sole market. Says Kerr: I think of NetSuite as CRM 2.0.

Harness your corporate brain

A knowledge management system helps you find the knowledge in your company and eliminate knowledge gaps due to employee turnover.

Remember when your firm was really small? You knew all your employees as well as you know your close friends, and could probably do all their jobs better than they could. But how about now, with employees scattered around different floors, offices or even cities. Now, you don’t know people intimately anymore and, worse, you don’t know what people know, says Nick Bontis, director of the Institute of Intellectual Capital Research and a professor of knowledge management at McMaster University in Hamilton, Ont.

That’s a very bad thing. Without effective, systematic ways of filtering, capturing and distributing the knowledge within your walls, you risk unnecessary duplication costs and can’t tap into the full intellectual horsepower of your company. More important, a proper knowledge management (KM) system helps you find the knowledge in your company and eliminate knowledge gaps due to employee turnover.

A 2003 study by KPMG revealed that 83% of organizations with a KM program in place said they had realized synergies among business units; 63% said they had accelerated innovation; and 67% said they had reduced costs. Among the non-financial benefits, companies experienced increased teamwork (68%), increased speed and responsiveness (64%) and better decision-making by front-line workers (55%). The same study revealed that 6% of companies’ annual revenue isn’t being realized because they fail to exploit knowledge effectively. The cost of KM is relatively low in comparison to the business opportunities it can exploit, say the authors of the KPMG report.

Effective KM processes at your company mean no more unnecessary duplication of work. A KM system, says Bontis, would allow you to know that Mike in Toronto shouldn’t start that sales presentation from scratch because Paula in Vancouver created the same presentation six months ago.

Start your KM initiative with an intranet-based document filing cabinet - a program that helps all employees add, navigate, search and retrieve information from disparate sources. Many such programs are now being offered online through the software-as-a-service model.

Bontis also strongly advocates comprehensive exit interviews for departing employees. He recommends hiring a human-resources consultancy to conduct exit interviews that capture the employee’s most useful knowledge - the stuff he knows that nobody else knows. At Mississauga, Ont.-based Pivotal Managed HR Solutions, for example, a 40-minute exit interview costs about $75 - although Bontis recommends even longer, more extensive interviews. The idea is to learn everything, from a client’s quirks to where the departing staffer keeps the keys to his filing cabinets. All the information gleaned would then be stored in the corporate intranet.

But KM isn’t just about capturing knowledge and technology; it’s also about communication and collaboration among employees. My research shows that for really good collaboration, you must have rapport, says Bontis. That’s only done face to face. So, as a leader, you must find institutional slack - which he defines as the time and space you set apart for the purposes of socialization. Whether it’s Thursday night at the bar, Friday afternoon in the lunchroom or Monday morning at the weekly sales meeting, companies must come up with a time and place where the only things that happen is people come together to informally socialize. We need to know who people really are in order to truly collaborate.

Do business in the buff

Open up your business and use collective intelligence to improve processes and products.

It’s natural to feel secretive about the inner workings of your company. Traditional corporate values shun transparency, and given today’s competitive business landscape, a CEO’s intuition tells him to keep his firm’s secrets under wraps.

But there’s growing evidence that opening up your business for the world to see - then using as many people as you can to contribute ideas about improving the processes and products you’ve put on full display - is a growth strategy for now and future. Call it collective intelligence. Could it work for your company?

In We Are Smarter Than Me: How to Unleash the Power of Crowds in Your Business, authors Barry Libert and Jon Spector argue that revealing the inner workings of your business and encouraging mass collaboration just makes sense in the Internet age. I don’t think it’s possible to hold on to the old idea of secrecy as a competitive advantage, says Libert. It’s not possible anymore for employees to be kept in the dark or to keep customers away from product innovation, because if you do, they have the voice of the Internet through blogs, wikis and discussion forums to say things about [you] and, ultimately, they’ll get the upper hand. Rather than allowing the marketplace to come to detrimental conclusions about your business based on misinformation or no information at all, turn everyone into an enlightened partner in your business process.

That getting customer and employee feedback is important isn’t news. But creating nakedness or being exposed or, as we say, ‘letting the zoo be run by the animals’ is what’s really creative here, says Libert. The more people that can get involved, whether it be employees or customers, the more innovative and vibrant a company can become. And, say Libert and Spector in We Are Smarter Than Me, in the case of customers, it gives them a vested interest in the results and all but guarantees they will like - and buy - what they’ve created.

You might already gather your constituents for annual focus groups or conferences in which you share information and collect feedback. The problem with that is it’s a single transaction, says Libert. It has no recurring nature to it, so it doesn’t engage the hearts and minds of the customers and employees year round.

You may not want to go as far as Microsoft, which posts uncensored internal videos on public websites and encourages its engineers to blog freely about their projects in order to get the public’s feedback and give the mammoth company a more human face. Still, try to think about ways to collect more feedback and create more discussion.

Consider adopting open-book management, whereby you give employees detailed financial and operational information, thus equipping them with the knowledge they need to make smart business decisions. Libert, for one, recommends starting with technology (perhaps Facebook or a wiki) that allows your employees to post profiles and share ideas in a more meaningful way than a suggestion box. Then, you can think about how to turn that externally focused, says Libert. Begin asking the same thing of your customers - what types of products and services would they like to see - and using discussion forums, blogs and wikis to engage in a real-time dialogue, a 360-degree process year-round.

Sell more with search engines

Search-engine marketing is one of today’s essential sales boosters.

From a company looking for a new technology supplier to an individual hunting for a new pair of shoes, the vast majority of buyers now begin their purchasing research online. A 2007 study by Kelowna, B.C.-based Enquiro Search Solutions, which provides search-engine optimization (SEO) services, shows that 85% of buyers go online when making a business purchasing decision. That’s why search-engine marketing, including optimization and the placement of paid ads beside organic search results, is one of today’s essential sales boosters. If you don’t help search engines find your website or use an ad services like Google Adwords, most of the planet’s billion Web users will never find your site - or your product.

Organic search-engine optimization is the process of designing your website content in such a way that users will find it through their search-engine queries. Optimized websites have descriptive and accurate title tags (i.e., the name on the top of each page), a site map and rich content that users don’t have to register to read. They use the same language that customers might use to search for it and, ideally, are linked to by lots of other websites.

But avoid using nefarious SEO tactics such as cloaking, hidden text or doorway pages. Google, for instance, has removed companies that use these tricks from its index. Get the boot, and it can take months to get traffic back, says Gord Hotchkiss, president and CEO of Enquiro.

Paid placement or pay per click (PPC) marketing can be as effective as it is economical. With PPC, your ad appears alongside the organic search-engine results when someone searches for keywords pre-selected by you (on Google, for instance, the PPC ads appear down the right side of the page), but you pay only if the user clicks on your ad. (Prices range from a few cents to more than $1 per click, depending on a keyword’s popularity.) Because keywords are purchased on a pay-for-performance basis, marketers can easily control their search-marketing spending.

It’s not impossible to do yourself, but Forrester recommends outsourcing all search-engine marketing, as it takes too much time and money for most firms to dedicate internal resources to manage volatile and complex search-marketing tools, technologies and ad formats.

Speakers’ Spotlight, a Toronto-based speaker’s agency, took the plunge two years ago, enlisting Enquiro to optimize its site. Since then, Speakers’ Spotlight’s total organic search engine-referrals have increased by 976%. Unique visitors to the firm’s website jumped by almost 300%, and hits by repeat visitors jumped by 106%. CEO Farah Perelmuter says her company’s newly optimized site has boosted her global business opportunities. We have found that the massive growth we’ve experienced online has impacted our sales tremendously, she says. We now book our speakers for events in numerous countries around the world, and for all different types of organizations. We have even generated media attention overseas and are approached with opportunities we would never have expected.

Create employee shareholders

An employee share-ownership plan is a highly effective way of making employees feel like they’re a part of the organization.

If you think all the talk of a labour shortage is nothing but hype, then consider the following facts. First, the CEOs of Canada’s Emerging Growth Companies recently said that a shortage of qualified workers is their single biggest external obstacle to further growth of their businesses. Second, research by the Canadian Federation of Independent Business shows that talent shortfalls are affecting entrepreneurs in all areas and industries - not just coffee shops in Alberta boomtowns. And finally, Generation Y - those workers born in the 1980s and 1990s who are notorious for their lack of loyalty to employers - now accounts for at least 19% of the workforce.

Clearly, any company that wants to thrive needs to place more emphasis on retaining good people. But many firms need help. One of the things that entrepreneurs have to do a bit better is making employees feel a part of the organization, says Mike Salveta, managing partner of Pivotal Managed HR Solutions. That is why people stay with a company.

Employee share-ownership plans (ESOPs), which formalize the process by which staff members purchase or are granted shares in their firms, are a highly effective management tool, for one obvious reason: staff are less likely to leave a company if they own a piece of it.

But there are other benefits to employee ownership. The largest study of ESOPs, conducted in 2000 by researchers at Rutgers University, found that ESOPs increase sales by 2.4% per year over non-ESOP companies. And according to the Oakland, Calif.-based National Center for Employee Ownership, employee-owned firms enjoy 4% to 5% annual productivity gains in the first few years after they employ an ESOP, double that of companies that aren’t employee-owned. Not surprisingly, almost half (47%) of Canada’s Fastest-Growing Companies run ESOPs.

But ESOPs have added value in an era in which more than 300,000 Canadian entrepreneurs have indicated their desire to sell their companies over the next 10 years. That’s because ESOPs create employee shareholders who will be in a better position to acquire majority ownership when their entrepreneur employer wants to exit the business.

ESOPs attract and retain people, and they can be used in transition planning, says Perry Philips, president of Thornhill, Ont.-based consultancy ESOP Builders. Combine the labour shortage with the coming succession crunch, and you have a perfect storm for the use of ESOPs.

Put social media in your mix

From blogs to Facebook, social media is the biggest up-and-comer in the world of marketing.

From blogs to Facebook, the communications applications of Web 2.0 keep increasing in availability and popularity. Forrester Research calls social media the biggest up-and-comer in the world of marketing - and says now is the time to get into it. Last year, we said holding off on social media was OK, says a recent Forrester report, but rapid consumer adoption of these channels indicates that the time is now to enter this space. Market-intelligence firm IDC predicts that the social-networking application market will grow by 815% by 2009, as its uses evolve out of basic networking into marketing, branding, customer service and lead generation.

Using social media has been everything for Mitch Joel, president of Montreal-based Twist Image, a digital marketing agency with 50 employees. Joel regularly blogs and has several bustling Facebook pages, and credits his use of social media with the success of his company. The only way we’ve done any promotion has been the blog, and this has led to us being perceived as thought leaders; it has led to speaking opportunities and created business growth, says Joel, who adds that RSS - Really Simple Syndication, which pushes new content to Joel’s subscribers as soon as it’s published - is an essential ingredient of any firm’s social media mix.

If you’re brand new to this stuff, blogging may be your best bet, says Maggie Fox, cofounder of Social Media Group, a Dundas, Ont.-based firm that helps companies connect with audiences by leveraging the power of emerging social media channels. With the right content, you can position yourself as an industry leader and really build relationships with customers, she says. Formerly, there were no opportunities for companies to do that in an affordable way.

Blogging is an amazing type of advertising, says Joel. It shows our creativity, it’s incredible for public relations and it enables us to engage clients in a conversation. Still, if you’re going to blog, you’d better have something valuable to say. Sharing your expertise and passion for your industry is the best way to secure a loyal - and possibly lucrative - following. You also need discipline, says Joel, who updates his blog daily; many blogs start in earnest but fade away after only a few weeks when the business owner gets too busy. Decent storytelling skills are another valuable asset. As a former journalist, Joel has experience expressing his thoughts in words. If writing isn’t your strong suit, get help.

Then, of course, there’s Facebook. Largely thought of as a place to reunite with your best friend from Grade 2, the social networking site is emerging as a powerful way for businesses to spread news and promote brand presence. Keep your eye out for business-specific applications on Facebook; you can now use the site for recruiting, selling and even financing through the new Lending Club application. Some large corporations, including PlayStation Canada and Molson, have created sponsored Facebook groups, paying a fee to create a branded page that boasts their firm’s look and feel.

No matter what your industry, don’t bury your head in the sand when it comes to social media. Businesses really can’t ignore this stuff, says Fox. Besides its effectiveness, she says, It’s extremely cost effective to participate in this space.

2007 Rogers Publishing Limited All rights reserved.

By Kim Shiffman